Re: Paths vs. Hosts

On Tuesday 07 September 2004 05:30, Sean Coates wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not a huge fan of the way docweb uses hostnames for language and > project determination. Mostly for portability reasons -- not everyone > can create hosts, or even wildcard hosts, but also I just don't like it, > and I can't come up with a concrete reason (-: I'm lucky that no-ip.com supports wildcards.. otherwise it wouldn't have worked for me. going for paths only is fine by me, all we need is to get lib_general.inc.php (include_path?) which defines PATH_ROOT and include problems should be solved, using full paths.. > > So, instead of complaining, I fixed it. > > My patch is available, here: http://www.phpdoc.info/docweb-rfc/ > > I'd like to get some feedback. I saw the patch.. would be nice if you can make it PEAR CS.. > > Example site: http://docweb.phpdoc.info/ > > It might still be a bit buggy, but I'm really looking for comments, and > we'll squash bugs in the coming days, if accepted (especially rfc/). yeah.. http://docweb.phpdoc.info/copyright.php but I don't think that would be hard to fix, just setting as www/all I guess about the RFC System.. I think WEB_ROOT and PATH_ROOT should be used there, won't that fix all url and path problems there? also, i don't think that we really need long urls like /php/nl/rfc/rfc-overview.php /rfc/.. would be fine IMO Vincent > > Please read the info at the rfc-patch page (above) for more info. > > S >