Re: To the German-people: filesystem.xml

Hello Mark, I'm with you in general, and the comparison is also between professional product against PHP as a Open Source. As a basis, we get already compared with also expensive prof. products like cfm, but now it's our turn to improve our stuff so that we don't leave ourself open for such a reference. And indeed, we have enough to do, since PHP gets more popular, e.g. 1.) Several extension-intros have "only Linux"-wordings, like: "....you must compile php with xxx support by using the --with-xxx option." Now imagine a Win-user, who just wants to make his Web dynamic: "What is compile?" 2.) The 1st array_flip()-example: $trans = array_flip ($trans); $original = strtr ($str, $trans); The same user: "What is $trans? What has $str to look like, and what will $original be?" To make a long story short: Now we have to fill the gap between the best Open Source documentation for a specific target-audience to a consistent documentation for mixed environments, and a mixed audience. Best regards, Thomas Mark Kronsbein wrote: > Thomas wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > BTW: Have you seen the bad reference for the PHP-DOC in relation to asp, > > etc. in the comparison between WebScriptLangs in "Internet Professionell"? I > > hope it doesn't get worse, if you really act with everybody like me. > > Ive seen it. It was not the first Article which Marco Zierl wrote about > PHP. > Though it was not the first which was nearly 90% wrong. Dont belive > everything > they write. > > IMHO the Documentation of PHP is one of the best Documentations of > Opensource Projects Ive ever seen. > > Just my 0,02 DM ;) > > Mark > > -- > German Gabber Network @ http://www.gabber.de > Infos und Tips zu PHP http://www.php-homepage.de