Re: Including en-version number with translations

Hi! Hi! Thanks for the explanation, didn't know this cvs-feature. This sounds very good, as it saves a second commit in the translators. But the bigger task would be reach out the message (We had this "version-issue" for Germans already, and also Egon seemed to agree in his message from 01-04-24 09:45, what seems to have changed now). If there is a common agreement to it for all langs, it would be nice to have some kind of an automatic reminder, for which I don't have any idea how to implement (because everybody can forget it :). --Thomas Jeroen Van Wolffelaar wrote: > > Hi Jeroen, > > > > thanks for this answer, and I also didn't doubt that he's really > > ready (NOW, but not in half a year, if he has to go to the hospital > > tomorrow). > > We're on the same line. > > > > Even better, IMO, is to include the en-version as a comment in the xml > file > > > itself. > > > > > > What about a $Revision: $ comment in all english files? > > > > Don't think that I got you right: > > > > Could you please explain it again (esp. the 2nd sentence)? > > Of course, what I mean with the FIRST line is like the first lines of > > phpdoc/nl/language/basis-syntax.xml: > <!-- up-to-date against phpdoc/en/language/basic-syntax.xml:1.3 --> > <chapter id="language.basic-syntax"> > <title>Basis syntax</title> > > And with the second line: > > phpdoc/en/language/basic-syntax.xml: (virtual ;) > <!-- This file is in revision $Revision 1.41 $ --> // this updates > automagically on each cvs commit > <chapter ... > > This way you can see in the file itself which revision it is, you don't need > to look at CVS/Entries or cvs.php.net or something. I think it's useful (for > en-only, that is) > > --Jeroen