Re: Manual notes maintainer assignment

On Friday, July 27, 2001, at 05:16 PM, Philip Olson wrote:

Hojtsy Gabor wrote:

Now php-notes@lists.php.net people are maitaining the manual notes. This change would be good IMHO, as there are not too many people there....

I'm new here but it appears that new notes are looked at pretty quickly these days. Usually minutes after a "bad" new note is posted, someone rejects/deletes it (usually Zak).

Depends on who's awake. Some folks just moderate based on their local clock... and they only take on new ones. Others work on specific pages, until the page is clean of notes.

There are a lot of notes out there that have lived within the manual for years, some of which are outdated and inappropriate. A coordinated effort of gurus to review each manual page and mark it as "approved" would be nice, and let the current team review new/old notes as done currently. We'd be caught up.

Ctaching up would be nice. :-) But even a flock of guru's might not add the errata back in...

I agree allowing the public to manage notes would work pretty well but for the record, I don't feel the "problem" sits with unmoderated new notes but rather, the old ones ... Spreading the love would help this too though, right?

We need more love, and more spreading. We need more doc folks. -Bop --2D426F70|759328624|00101101010000100110111101110000 ron@opus1.com, 520-326-6109, http://www.opus1.com/ron/ The opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily those of myself, my employers, or any of the other little voices in my head.