Re: coding standards - draft

> > So example can contain screens and paras. So the COMPLETE > > EXAMPLE SKELETON in your draft is right. > > Thanks for your check. As said, I am not very familiar with Docbook :-). > Therfore I didn`t ment that this is the only one and right way to write > examples :-) With certainty someone else with more docbook-knowledge should provide > an better example. Maybe the one I copied is not appropriate? And maybe this > point is not so important, as long as the XML-Code is correct. The output example was right, I only thought about the possible docbook problems. But there are no problems with it anymore on my side. Goba