Re: Obsolete modules in php4?
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 19:12:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Obsolete modules in php4? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969341216@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> > > > > Modules like iisfunc are moved to pear/PECL.
> > > > > Documents for them should be moved to pear.
> > > > >
> > > > > Or am I wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > >
> > > It would be nice if the documentation is kept in one place so
> > people don't
> > > have to remember where the function came from.
> >
> > Do you mean with "one place" peardoc or phpdoc?
>
> I meant phpdoc. People are used to www.php.net/funcname. The documentation
> should have some standard note that this module is part of PECL and how
you
> can install it (which is hard to tell right now :).
So this means, all future PECL modules will be
documented in phpdoc. IMHO this is definetly not
the right way. There are resons, why PECL was
separated from php4/ext... The same reasons apply
for phpdoc and peardoc (here read peardoc as the
repository in cvs).
The php.net/funcname thing can be expanded to jump
you over to pear.php.net/funcname, if people think
they would like to access PECL functions with this
technique.
Just my 2 cents.
Goba