Re: See also
| From: | Egon Schmid | Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:09:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: See also | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969341242@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
From: "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz>
Egon Schmid wrote:
> > Jirka, please don´t make changes for the rendering of the "see
also"
> > notes until there is a solution for the incomplete PDF manuals.
IMHO
> > it is an overkill.
> You mean: overkill = too much markup?
Yes.
> In general you are right, but marking some block as "seealso" can
be
> very usefull when rendering and converting to other formars (e.g.
HTML
> Help). Handling role="seealso" on para will be possible but much
more
> harder then on note. Using note as a container allows you to use
> simplelist if you want some longer list of functions or whatever
else be
> seealso-ed.
I don´t have something against a rendering a "see also" block. But
rendering the content with a list would be a nightmare. We had a
discussion at which place should be comma in this list. This depends
on the language and I can guess it will be look very funny in
Arabic.
> Ultimately, you guys (Egon, Goba, Harmut) should agree on correct
markup
> pattern. I just offered my opinion from DocBook markup point of
view.
If Goba and Hartmut ignores me, so we will have never a agreement.
> > It is much better to write the "see also" notes
> > as before. Indeed it will be too complex if you consider the
other
> > languages with different rules for rendering.
> I see no problem here, if you are afraid of localizations of "see
also"
> this is not problem as there is localization for this string
already
> present in stylesheets.
You can do so, but don´t make a list.
-Egon