Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/misc/functions highlight-file.xml
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Sat, 11 May 2002 19:25:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/misc/functions highlight-file.xml | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969345484@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> there are reports about this (don't know their # though).
>
> Am I the only who thinks that documenting such a change of
> the behaviour of a function is important?
>
> And if it's like you said, then it just is that way. Nothing
> is more painful for a user to find out a function now behaves
> differently without a note why and since when. There's no
> harm done, I only can see a benefit.
> > > > > + <simpara>
> > > > > + Since PHP 4.2.1 this function is also affected by <link
> > > > > + linkend="ini.safe-mode">safe mode</link>, i.e.
> > > > > only files
which pass the
> > > > > + <link linkend="ini.safe-mode">safe mode</link>
> > > > > restriction
are shown.
> > > > > </simpara>
As this change was made in 4.2.1 guys upgrading PHP, and so upgrading
scripts may find this useful. If it always worked that way, then there
is no point to add a note, but this way, it deserves it IMHO. BTW we
also have a table of functions affected by safe mode on the safe mode
page...
Goba