Re: Re: #18756 [NEW]: August Edition Format Poorly Designed

> I agree totally with xilord. For the CHM version, there already is a > built-in Index tab, so the new "Alphabetical Function List" is > redundant and a lot less useful. We do not distribute manuals with different contents for different formats (excluding the new CHM manual which has a CHM specific part of it's ow). The reason for this is the only way we can present users with consistent content whatever version they use of the manual. BTW the CHM is the only one place, where this "Alphabetical Function List" *may* be useless, but I need to point out, that the Index tab contains much more than functions, so a distinct function index may be good too (for programmed access for example). Goba