Re: ini-seetings

[...] >> >> Where should error and logging config options go to, to errorfunc? >> >> > Features / error handling ? >> >> Ok, this would imply to link them from refernce/errorfunc. > Doh, reverting my last suggection, put them to reference/errorfunc. Done :-) > As discussed before, if we go on with the multilevel reference TOC > (see phpdoc/rfc/manual.xml.in), things like features/persistent > connections will go to the database level in the TOC. Error handling > description can already be moved to reference/errorfunc IMHO. It's > definitely like an intro in other parts, like the XML or session parts. > We don't have a features/session part, because this text is in the session > functions intro, and so should the features go to their relevant part. > As far as I can remember, we already discussed this ;) I can't remember...;-) I have the time to move/integrate features/error-handling to reference/errorfunc. I took a look at RFC/manual.xml.in: <part id="features"> <title>&Features;</title> &features.error-handling; ... Here it is still under features. Is it ok to integrate the features/error-handling in referenc/errorfunc? Friedhelm Friedhelm