Re: Re: Apache 2 installation instructions
| From: | Melvyn Sopacua | Date: | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:34:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Apache 2 installation instructions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.dev php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969349339@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 11:30 10/29/2002 +0100, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
That's exactly what is the perception. I can live with that, but it's not very stimulating for the people that work on apachefilter. Since the 'official' release, Apache has changed it's API breaking BC 2 times already. How can extension developers work on improvement then?documentationI think, it would be nice to add information to one place, theAh yes - but that will contradict greatly, to "the best version yet" marketing trick the Apache Group is advertising on their front page. We can mention it to users, in the bug db etc. But officially documenting, that Apache 2 is really a beta product, doesn't really express consistency, between the "family". I thought it more from another point of view: the support for apache2 in php is not production stable ,e.g. the sapi in php :-)about Apache 2 support. 1. It's not production ready
Maybe this is due to the fact (?) that apache2 is still beta (I really don't know) but form the php-side point of view, php-versions are not production stable in conjunction with apache2.Maybe for windows it's the better version - I have no idea. For unix it's far from that.
As Derick said, I don't think this will hurt someone of the apachegroup.Fine with me - we all know better -;) ____________________________________________________ </MELVYN> void wakeup() {
for(unsigned int cuppajava;drink();cuppajava++);}