#17386 [Opn]: Associativity of assignment operators listed wrongly

ID: 17386 Updated by: john@php.net Reported By: m.ford@lmu.ac.uk Status: Open Bug Type: Documentation problem PHP Version: 4.1.2 Assigned To: john New Comment: I'll make the change for the associtivity from left to right, but I don't know if I should just make a note of the example regarding precedence rules. Anyone know if its intended behavior, or should this have thrown a parse error? John Previous Comments: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2002-05-23 09:34:04] m.ford@lmu.ac.uk The operators page at /manual/en/language.operators.php lists the the assignment operators (=, +=, etc.) as being left associative, but they must logically be right associative. Left associativity would mean that this: $a = $b = 0; was interpreted as: ($a = $b) =0; which is clearly nonsensical. Indeed a quick test shows that: $d = $c += $a += $b += 4; is interpreted as: $d = ($c += ($a += ($b += 4))); which looks like right associativity to me! (Actually, a little further testing suggests that the assignment operators need some special annotations, as they don't appear to strictly obey their stated precedence level. For example, the statement: $x = $z + $y = 543; if interpreted strictly according to the precedence rules should be equivalent to: $x = ($z + $y) = 543; which would be a parse error, but in fact is interpreted as: $x = $z + ($y = 543); which may be the "obvious" intention, but had me WTF-ing for a while!!) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=17386&edit=1