Re: legacy entities was: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /entities global.ent
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Mon, 02 Dec 2002 22:24:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: legacy entities was: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /entities global.ent | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969350125@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Friedhelm Betz wrote:
>
> >> > removing dead links, and updating fr doc
> >>
> >> AHHH, my bad! Didn't take into account all
> >> the translations! :(
> >>
> >> I'm away from my CVS tree right now but if
> >> someone doesn't update them all I will
> >> eventually. I promise to keep this in mind
> >> in the future.
>
> > IMHO it would be good to move all the EN-unused enties
> > from global.ent to a new "legacy.ent", and also include
> > that in the build process. So translators will be able
> > to spot where they documentation need to be updated
> > regarding "unused" entities. We have many EN-unused
> > entities listed in globals.ent (at the bottom), which
> > are target for deletion, but we never deleted them
> > because of translation build problems. I guess most of
> > the translators don't know that there are entities for
> > future deletion (and moving them to legacy.ent may help
> > them to recognize the fact). Just a suggestion though...
>
> > Goba
>
> At least scripts/entities.php could be run with make test?
> Its not the "final" solution but maybe a point of start.
>
> Having a legacy.ent would be nice:-)
> Here is the actual output of entities.php for the en tree, only the
> unsused ones from global.ent:
> ENTITY USAGE STATISCTICS
It would be nice if it did this opposite of this as
entities.php imho wouldn't be useful in 'make test'
as it's not a big deal to have unused entities in
there. But it is a big deal to use entities that
are not declared! Do we have a script that tests
this? Anyway, it would basically do the entities.php
check on legacy.ent and it would differentiate
between each translation. Maybe this is what you
mean?
[snip]
> Don't know how trustworthy the output is, because url.mm is
> definitly used in ref/session:-) ( dark in my mind, I can remember
> Philip added url.installkits)
>
> Out of this output a legacy.ent could be produced
Don't delete installkits or zend.funcref, I have
plans for those. :)
I think we all should help give Goba time to create the
legacy.ent, what can we do to help Goba? :)
Regards,
Philip