Re: dns_*() vs. PEAR::Net_DNS
| From: | Gabor Hojtsy | Date: | Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:02:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: dns_*() vs. PEAR::Net_DNS | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969350551@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Anyway, my question is... Would it be appropriate to ammend the notes
> which currently show on those manual pages:
>
> Note: This function is not implemented on Windows platforms.
>
> with a mention of the PEAR alternative?:
>
> Note: This function is not implemented on Windows platforms. Try the pear
> class Net_DNS.
>
> Possibly with a link to the package (
> http://pear.php.net/package-info.php?pacid=59 )
>
> The thing is I don't see a lot of endorsement of PEAR classes on the
> PHP.net site in general and I've NEVER seen mention of PEAR packages in
> the manual at all.
Well, as far as I see, it's perfectly OK, to mention a PEAR class,
and add a link. It is sort of an "official PHP product". PEAR is
meant to complement the PHP core and extensions with advanced (~higher
level) functionality.
Goba