Re: streams reference

On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > > > Actually, turns out: > > > stream_get_meta_data > > > stream_register_wrapper > > > stream_set_blocking > > > stream_set_timeout > > > stream_set_write_buffer > > > > > > ARE in the manual under the filesystem section. Should the missing > > > functions be added in there? Or still go ahead with creating a new streams > > > section and move these guys over? > > > > IMHO, it should be a new streams section. Streams are used by many > > other things, not just file functions (eg. include/require). > > I would favor that too. A major benefit of this new section will be having its own large introduction. This is much needed as it needs to be wordy, and include examples and comparisons of a few other "alternative/older" methods. I do not volunteer doing this as I don't understand the topic of streams yet but I do look forward to these docs, please put them in laymens terms ;) Regards, Philip