Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml
fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml
| From: | Sara Golemon | Date: | Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:01:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml |
||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969350874@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
>> > I'm personnally -1 on using "handle" as the parameter name, but
>> > it's
>> a weak -1... maybe more of a -0.5
>>
>> Well, $fp is something kinda "leftover" for "file pointer". As fopen
>> opens many more things then files (eg. STDIN :), it technically not a
>> file pointer anymore. Therefore I think handle is better ;)
>
> I'm for "handle" too.
>
> Derick
>
Okay, I'll switch all these to "handle" instead of "fp" (and I do see your
points and reasonings) and look for other similar instances to keep up
consistency.
I'm off to the aquarium today though, so don't look for the commits until
tonight.
-Pollita