Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml
fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml

From: Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 20:01:54 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/filesystem/functions fclose.xml feof.xml fflush.xml fgetc.xml fgetcsv.xml fgets.xml fgetss.xml flock.xml fopen.xml
fpassthru.xml fputs.xml fread.xml fscanf.xml
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969350874@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
>> > I'm personnally -1 on using "handle" as the parameter name, but >> > it's >> a weak -1... maybe more of a -0.5 >> >> Well, $fp is something kinda "leftover" for "file pointer". As fopen >> opens many more things then files (eg. STDIN :), it technically not a >> file pointer anymore. Therefore I think handle is better ;) > > I'm for "handle" too. > > Derick > Okay, I'll switch all these to "handle" instead of "fp" (and I do see your points and reasonings) and look for other similar instances to keep up consistency. I'm off to the aquarium today though, so don't look for the commits until tonight. -Pollita

« previous php.doc (#969350874) next »