"/usr/bin/cvs" -z6 diff "openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml"
Index: openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /repository/phpdoc/en/reference/openssl/functions/openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml
--- openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml 10 Dec 2002 19:13:48 -0000 1.4
+++ openssl-csr-export-to-file.xml 24 Mar 2003 13:03:08 -0000
@@ -18,11 +18,8 @@
<function>openssl_csr_export_to_file</function> takes the Certificate
Signing Request represented by <parameter>csr</parameter> and saves it
as ascii-armoured text into the file named by <parameter>outfilename</parameter>.
+ &reference.openssl.parameter-notext;
&return.success;
- The optional <parameter>notext</parameter> affects
- the verbosity of the output; if it is &false; then additional human-readable information is included
- in the output. The default value of <parameter>notext</parameter> is
- &true;
</para>
<simpara>
See also <function>openssl_csr_export</function>,
and parameter-notext.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- $Revision: 1.1 $ -->
The optional <parameter>notext</parameter> affects
the verbosity of the output; if it is &false; then additional human-readable
information is included in the output. The default value of
<parameter>notext</parameter> is &true;.
....
opinions?
I don't think that cluttering is a problem in this case. But XML files need to have a root tag, so parameter-notext.xml should have a root element (<para> probably)...
We need to have a naming convention, so the additional files can be identified by their names...
Goba