cvs: phpdoc /en/faq languages.xml

philip Thu May 22 15:09:25 2003 EDT Modified files: /phpdoc/en/faq languages.xml Log: Removing dead OpenASP link, doesn't seem to exist anymore. Index: phpdoc/en/faq/languages.xml diff -u phpdoc/en/faq/languages.xml:1.11 phpdoc/en/faq/languages.xml:1.12 --- phpdoc/en/faq/languages.xml:1.11 Fri Feb 7 04:16:18 2003 +++ phpdoc/en/faq/languages.xml Thu May 22 15:09:25 2003 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> -<!-- $Revision: 1.11 $ --> +<!-- $Revision: 1.12 $ --> <chapter id="faq.languages"> <title>PHP and other languages</title> <titleabbrev>PHP and other languages</titleabbrev> @@ -26,15 +26,13 @@ <ulink url="&url.instantasp;">InstantASP</ulink> from <ulink url="&url.halcyon;">Halcyon</ulink> (commercial), <ulink url="&url.chilisoft.asp;">Chili!Soft ASP</ulink> from - <ulink url="&url.chilisoft;">Chili!Soft</ulink> - (commercial) and <ulink url="&url.openasp;">OpenASP from - ActiveScripting.org</ulink> (free). ASP is said to be a slower - and more cumbersome language than PHP, less stable as well. Some of - the pros of ASP is that since it primarily uses VBScript it's - relatively easy to pick up the language if you're already know - how to program in Visual Basic. ASP support is also enabled by - default in the IIS server making it easy to get up and running. - The components built in ASP are really limited, so if you + <ulink url="&url.chilisoft;">Chili!Soft</ulink> (commercial). + ASP is said to be a slower and more cumbersome language than PHP, less + stable as well. Some of the pros of ASP is that since it primarily + uses VBScript it's relatively easy to pick up the language if you're + already know how to program in Visual Basic. ASP support is also + enabled by default in the IIS server making it easy to get up and + running. The components built in ASP are really limited, so if you need to use "advanced" features like interacting with FTP servers, you need to buy additional components. </para>