Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/strings/functions number-format.xml

On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 07:08, Mehdi wrote: > Hi, > > I was thinking, is there a way to have a new structure for the protos > definitions ? As this commit shows it, the current system suffers from > some lacks. We can't express the optional arguments as we want. Agreed. But there is a relatively small number of functions where this problem shows up. I don't think it's something anyone has to particularly worry about -- having two protos for those special cases is fine by me. John -- -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~- John Coggeshall john at coggeshall dot org http://www.coggeshall.org/ -~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~--~=~-