Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/misc/functions eval.xml

From: Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:54:12 +0000
Subject: Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/misc/functions eval.xml
References: 1  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969354405@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Le lundi, 9 jun 2003, à 15:31 America/Montreal, Philip Olson a écrit :
<function>return</function> is how it's done, just like <function>include</function>, <function>print</function>, etc. Yet, return is not a function, unlike include or print.
<literal> could get a link to the anchor in the doc to return. same would apply to continue and break, while, for..... That is more consistent. What do you think? Damien Seguy.

« previous php.doc (#969354405) next »