Why our own tag for see also would be better?
- 98% [approx] of see alsos are not that exoticaly worded, as you
have done in your example
- with our own tags, no translation would be needed for this part
- there will be an ability to automatically recognize see also parts,
which can seriously help in presentation, and automatic discovery
[eg. we can check what parts are better connected in the manual,
and what needs more attention]
i remember that we have thought about it before (when someone insisted
that in english a comma is needed before the 'and' here ...) ...
and AFAIR there are DocBook tags for lists or enumerations that we
could use with setting a special role attribute ... i even did some
experimental stuff with this back then but somehow this got lost
on the way ...
i'll try to remember what i did back then ...
As far as I can remember, it was some bloated XML syntax [ie. too much markup]. But let is come up again, we have this on the docmeeting agenda :)
Goba