Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/language control-structures.xml

Hi Derick, On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 13:10, Derick Rethans wrote: > Hey, > > can you please re-close the bug, I had to restore a backup. > i just did. -ali > Derick > > > On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Ali wrote: > > > ali Fri Aug 15 06:42:24 2003 EDT > > > > Modified files: > > /phpdoc/en/language control-structures.xml > > Log: > > fixing bug #20739 > > > > > > Index: phpdoc/en/language/control-structures.xml > > diff -u phpdoc/en/language/control-structures.xml:1.78 > > phpdoc/en/language/control-structures.xml:1.79 > > --- phpdoc/en/language/control-structures.xml:1.78 Fri Jun 13 07:00:03 2003 > > +++ phpdoc/en/language/control-structures.xml Fri Aug 15 06:42:23 2003 > > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> > > -<!-- $Revision: 1.78 $ --> > > +<!-- $Revision: 1.79 $ --> > > <chapter id="control-structures"> > > <title>Control Structures</title> > > > > @@ -1096,9 +1096,8 @@ > > <simpara> > > Note that since <function>return</function> is a language > > construct and not a function, the parentheses surrounding its > > - arguments are <emphasis>not</emphasis> required--in fact, it is > > - more common to leave them out than to use them, although it > > - doesn't matter one way or the other. > > + arguments are <emphasis>only</emphasis> required if the argument > > + contains an expression. It is common to leave them out while returning a variable. > > </simpara> > > </note> > > </para> > > > > > > > > > > -- > "Interpreting what the GPL actually means is a job best left to those > that read the future by examining animal entrails." > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Derick Rethans > http://derickrethans.nl/ > International PHP Magazine > http://php-mag.net/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- http://evilphp.com/key.asc