Re: Serious bugs on tidy functions names!

From: Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 18:43:58 +0000
Subject: Re: Serious bugs on tidy functions names!
References: 1  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969356864@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
[...] > > Brrr, I don't know who named the files with :: in them, but it was not a > good idea at all... :(( > scripts/xml_proto.php, I guess. Maybe john was inspired by the latest doc skels I committed ;-) I used xml_proto.php to generate them, after trying the scripts from Hartmut's functable (http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/functable). Those didn't work for me (http://cvs.php.net/cvs.php/functable/lib/proto2xml.php) and I hadn't the time to look why. So I used xml_proto.php;) Maybe soom I'll find the time to fix xml_proto.php. About the tidy function names: we should treat them the way the domxml extension does,no? Or do we have another, more generic docbook solution? Deep in my mind I remember some postings from Hartmut about class methods in docbook, but I can't recap at the moment. So far Friedhelm -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++

« previous php.doc (#969356864) next »