Re: Re: documenting php5
| From: | Sara Golemon | Date: | Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:35:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: documenting php5 | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969357181@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> I have yet to see a function with this on it maybe I am just blind, most
> functions I see have the no version info may only be in cvs which is down
> right confusing what cvs branch for one ;)
>
Initially it has "No Version Information" but when whatshisname runs his
version script every so often, the version information is added....
dns_get_record() is (again) a good example as it's been documented for
nearly a year.
> Not really but as you said some params wont be in it and may be buried in
a
> user comment or the such, generally the docs team is good with staying on
> top of things but these things do happen. Maybe separate strings for
> separate versions but this again is a hassle on the documenter and creates
a
> mess in the docs, colours are always nice ;)
>
If the manual doesn't get updated with functionality changes it's the
programmer's fault and (s)he should be whipped within an inch of thier life.
> Good idea, but as you say a pain in the arse specially when it comes to
> merging especially user notes ;) and the need doesn't arise to often
mainly
> around a major release I would assume
>
So maybe instead of PHP_4_3, PHP_5_0, PHP_5_1 style branching, just go with
PHP_4, PHP_5 style....
That feels like a half measure.... but as recently stated, I'm generally
against it anyway.
-Sara (Duplicitous as always)