Re: RE: OO docs 1

Steph wrote: >> Or still to change all manual from >> methodsynopsys/methodname/methodparam to >> funcsynopsis/funcparams/parameter... And I'm not crazy ;) > > What, no grep? ;) No realy, you know ;p > There's no reason you should change the way you document non-OO > functions. Only to separate then from OO-functions (METHODS! METHODS!) in tag level. >> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/classsynopsis.html >> A ClassSynopsis contains the syntax summary of a class (generally >> speaking, >> a class in the object-oriented programming language sense). >> >> This and the <method> tag may simplifies our lives. > > Where did you see the <method> tag? I don't see it :| <funcsynopsis> has <function> Why not a <class> for <classsynopsis>, a <method> for <methodsynopsys> and a <constructor> for <constructorsynopsis>... We speak in making our proper solution, but perhaps let us can convince the DocBook's staff in adding these tags, if to decide for this way. André Æ