Re: splitting security chapter

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:19, Gabor Hojtsy wrote: > > splitting huge files makes life for translation teams easier. Therefore I > > am always +1 for splitting. > > > > The functions source xml-files are read for review : > > http://www.holliwell.de/security/security.tar.bz2 > > along with the compiled security chapter: > > http://www.holliwell.de/security/ > > As it seems there are some small changes made with this split (a title > was added for the intro sectin). Since the split would be good to be done > for all languages, this is not a good idea, as the change is hard to > track with the split. Changes should be made IMHO after the split. > > Goba I consider this rather a real split of the security chapter, than just a "normal" change in the en version. Trans teams can pick them up as they find the time. Btw, as long as the old index.xml is splitted up, the new one with changed content would replace the original one. So there is no version we could refer to claimed by "Last change was don in Rev..." Friedhelm