Re: Docs for dom extension

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Rob Richards wrote: > So does it make sense that I should be appending dom- to the functions as > well to avoid collisions with the domxml documentation? > > i.e. <refentry id="function.dom-domdocument-xinclude"> Well, no other choice is there? > And in doing so is there a way to change the text disaplyed when using a > function tag to link to another doc page? Hmm, this is what the docbook page on it says: file:///dat/docs/specs/docbook-tdg/html/function.html Perhaps <function><link linkend="<<ID>>">functionname</link></function> works... > I played with it a bit and the functions link correctly, but the text > displayed when rendered ends up looking nasty. How nasty? :) Derick