Re: cvs: phpdoc /dsssl/docbook/html dblink.dsl
| From: | Antony Dovgal | Date: | Wed, 19 May 2004 06:12:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpdoc /dsssl/docbook/html dblink.dsl | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969360688@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 18 May 2004 21:44:20 +0200 (CEST)
Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 May 2004, Gabor Hojtsy wrote:
>
> > >>Two notes/questions:
> > >>
> > >> - have you tested that the upgraded stuff works?
> > >
> > > yep, I've tried to build some languages firstly.
> > > and take a look at the diff - it's obviuos, that this specific file can't
> > > break anything.
> >
> > Aham...
> >
> > >> - why do you modify the sheets? we used to use the original
> > >> sheets with our customizations, since people can use their
> > >> local sheet copies as well
> > >
> > > I tried to not touch the ones, which were customized.
> > > sorry if I did it, just tell me and I restore old files (or I can port customizations
> > > to the new version, if you prefer).
> >
> > I think you misunderstood me. I said that we used to have an *untouched*
> > DSSSL sheet distribution in our module, and we have only modified it's
> > working with our customizations (our own DSSSL addon sheets). As far as
> > I have seen you have done some modifications to the distributed files
> > themselfs. I don't understand, why those modifications were needed, so
> > probably this is why I don't understand. This kind of modification is
> > not future compatible, since we might need to upgrade sometime, and will
> > not be able to stop that there were differences from the original DSSSL
> > sheet distribution.
>
> AFAIK upgrading to a newer version of the DSSSL sheets was all what he
> did.
Yep.
You can grab them from SF.net and compare - it's just a new version, without any modifications.
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
tony2001@phpclub.net || antony@dovgal.com