Re: Re: commit cookies.xml file

Gabor Hojtsy wrote:

Well, I have seen no agreement on using &php;, and it was even not proposed with reasons if I remember correctly. Why do you think that &php; is better than PHP?

I never told that :) The original idea was to use &php; for <literal>PHP</literal>, and it was just an example used by Damien [1] to propose some more entities to the English manual. Now, after this discussion, I feel like the <literal> (or product) tag is not really needed and that it also make the titles ugly :) [2]. The real discussion is more generic and is about adding more entities in phpdoc. Damien is using a set of entities for the French documentation and (imho) some of them are really needed, for example &ini.table.top; that is the <thead> of any ini.xml reference file. But since you're working the ini sections, let's forget about this for the moment, I'm sure you'll use some well chosed entities ;) didou [1] - http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=phpdoc&m=108453731906911&w=2 [2] - http://didou.keliglia.com/php/phpman/index.php?l=fr&q=reserved