Re: the <acronym> tag, time for a title? (livedocs integration)

> > Note that livedocs core developers do accept patches. Have you seen Ilia > > accepting the patch from Curt to fix the font sizes on the php.net view? > > It is just that they have a hard time following the traffic on phpdoc. > > Ilia himself has a trigger on cvs commit messages with "livedocs" in > > them to get :) I've sent two patches to Ilia and to Wez and I've received no answers... One had a performance boost of about 50% in highlighting PHP (based on Goba function in php.net) > > Livedocs needs more testers, and more people willing to put time into > > it. I never found enough time to help out, but I try to direct everybody > > who is not satisfied with the lack of insite search, lack of timely > > manual updates, etc. to help in livedocs development as that is clearly > > the way to go. Livedocs still has a main problem: the links. Livedocs isn't also working well with windows. Latest changes by Wez to make the paths relatives broke livedocs on windows, because of diffences on slashes (/ versus \) between phpdoc build system and livedoc's. I've already reported this problem a while ago, along with some solutions/patches to solve the problem. > We need docs.php.net online, and docweb on a reliable, working, > and maintained server; and in PHP CVS. The current situation there > looks a bit screwy but I've only been an observer there. I do like > the idea of a core group starting it out, less noise, but is it ready > for others now or is the server problem still holding things back? > Maybe we got a little too aggressive with idealistic ideas and should > just focus on one thing at a time, like livedocs, I don't know. Yes, the code needs to be in CVS. It will be soon, althought I thought it was sooner.... We are having problems with the temp server... so, we really need a definitive server! I don't know of what now we are waiting for. I thought Nexen offered a server, but I've never saw it on-line... > Once ready for testing (now?), docs.php.net can simply be livedocs like > it used to be (or a shell of docweb) and we won't "advertise" it. People > will slowly use it this way and the more people start using it the more > people will complain and more importantly the more people will fix > problems and add features. If a major problem exists there we can > redirect users to php.net/manual/ Also, it should add excitement to > the docweb project, a project few know even exists right now[1]. The docweb project was largely advertised on all doc mailling lists. Livedocs is in alpha stage. It has a couple of well know bugs. So, first let's fix them, and then make it public. Nuno