a few coding standards

Hello all! Just want to confirm that the following are true as I don't believe these have been made official [yet]: a) No ending period in the reftitle b) No ending period in the see also c) Only part of docs wider than 78 characters is methodsynopsis d) New examples use ' not " wherever possible (this is old since PEAR coding standards describe it but few do it, not sure why) e) All new (and eventually old) docs will use the new upcoming 'refsect style' Regarding (a), it's a little strange when a reftitle has multiple sentences, or commas, as it means only partial punctuation is used when we leave off the ending period. Should we live with that? Most are not this way so it should be fine. Also, many times these titles aren't even complete sentences. With (b) it would be nice if we didn't manually type in commas either but it seems we abandoned that idea. Goba? Adding them feels a little dirty but also simple and doable. As far as (e) goes I'll write a separate email regarding a CHANGELOG refsect1 proposal (this has been discussed many times!) but other than that what do you guys think? Regards, Philip