Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/bcompiler/functions bcompiler-write-header.xml /en/reference/calendar/functions cal-info.xml
/en/reference/fbsql/functions fbsql-create-db.xml fbsql-query.xml fbsql-start-db.xml /en/reference/filesystem/functions
| From: | Jakub Vrana | Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:18:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/bcompiler/functions bcompiler-write-header.xml /en/reference/calendar/functions cal-info.xml /en/reference/fbsql/functions fbsql-create-db.xml fbsql-query.xml fbsql-start-db.xml /en/reference/filesystem/functions |
||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969365012@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -
> <methodparam><type>IteratorAggregate</type><parameter>iterator</parameter></methodparam>
> +
> <methodparam><type>object</type><parameter>iterator</parameter></methodparam>
Nuno Lopes wrote:
> not sure if I agree with this change.. although IteratorAggregate is an
> object, I think that typing it explicitly makes it easier to understand at
> first sight.
> Don't you agree?
I'm not sure. It's all around the docs. Howto lists "object" as allowed
type and doesn't say anything about IteratorAggregate :-). My opinion is
that there should be "object" in methodsynopsis and what kind of object
is it should be explained in the description.
What's the Goba's and others' opinion?
Jakub Vrana