Re: #34476 [Bgs->Opn]: ulink doesn't appear on livedocs

>>Is better to use reference which is most suitable for our templates. >>DocBook evolves and it might be ok to stick with old edition if only >>templates were stable, but templates change and along with new features >>from new DocBook standard there are a lot of bugfixes. In other words if >>we use new templates we need to use a reference that describes them best. > > I hear you. I'm not trying to start a fight (-: > The problem with "most suitable for our templates" is that we have at > least 3 sets of templates: dsssl, xsl, and livedocs. > > I think we should choose a solid, official reference, and use that (and > mention it in the howto). > > The reference you've been using seems to be: > "Version 2.0.12 is a “work in progress”. It purports to document DocBook > V4.4 with the EBNF, HTML Forms, MathML, and SVG modules. As it is being > actively updated, it may be inconsistent in some areas." > > While I've been using: > "Version 1.0.3 is an online version of the first edition of the book. It > documents DocBook V3.1." > > Like I said: I don't care which, so long as we're using the same. My > choice was based on "work in progress" which scares me, from a reference > standpoint. The DocBook Definitve Guide is always a work in progress. The PHP Manual is a "work in progress" indefinitely and still, people are not scared to use it as a reference :) My take is that we should use the DocBook reference corresponding to the exact (or close to that) version we use. See the DTD reference in manual.xml. Goba