#35927 [Csd->Bgs]: relationship between COM and OLE
| From: | nlopess@php.net | Date: | Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:44:15 +0000 |
| Subject: | #35927 [Csd->Bgs]: relationship between COM and OLE | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969371502@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 35927
Updated by: nlopess@php.net
Reported By: temp dot stuff at gmail dot com
-Status: Closed
+Status: Bogus
Bug Type: Documentation problem
PHP Version: Irrelevant
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2006-01-10 23:11:39] temp dot stuff at gmail dot com
You're right. my bad.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2006-01-09 15:46:06] vrana@php.net
Wikipedia: "COM is often used in the software development world as an
umbrella term that encompasses the OLE, ActiveX, COM+ and DCOM
technologies." Thus OLE Automation can be subset of COM.
It's the same what you say: "every OLE2 component is a COM component"
means there are COM components and one of them is OLE2 component.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2006-01-08 02:30:11] temp dot stuff at gmail dot com
Description:
------------
The link http://il2.php.net/manual/en/ref.com.php states
that OLE is a
subset of COM: "There is a subset of COM known as OLE Automation which
comprises a set of COM interfaces that allow loose binding to COM
objects".
But OLE isn't a subset of COM. OLE2 is a superset of COM - every OLE2
component is a COM component, but the opposite is incorrect.
OLE is a superset of COM, it's "more" than COM.
Saying OLE is a subset of COM is like saying C++ is a subset of C...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=35927&edit=1