#35308 [Opn]: Suggestions for improving security note documentation
| From: | bjori@php.net | Date: | Sun, 07 Jan 2007 08:30:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | #35308 [Opn]: Suggestions for improving security note documentation | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969374697@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
ID: 35308
Updated by: bjori@php.net
Reported By: cjbj at hotmail dot com
Status: Open
-Bug Type: Website problem
+Bug Type: Documentation problem
Operating System: n/a
PHP Version: Irrelevant
New Comment:
Reclassified as documentation problem.
Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2005-11-21 06:34:56] cjbj at hotmail dot com
Description:
------------
The phrasing in http://www.php.net/security-note.php has caused
confusion in at least one database administrator's mind about the
safeness of PHP. See
http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=340485
for one report of confusion.
Can the fourth paragraph of the security note be modied to read
For Local exploits we mostly hear about open_basedir or
safemode problems on shared virtual hosts. These two
features are there as a convenience to system administrators
and should in no way be thought of as a complete security
framework. With all the 3rd-party libraries you can hook
into PHP and all the creative ways you can trick these
libraries into accessing files, it is impossible to guarantee
security with these directives. The CURL extension is a
library that allows local file system access despite the
value of open_basedir. Another example is that Oracle
Database can be configured to allow local files to be loaded
into the database. Access control is handled by Oracle and
is not under control of PHP.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=35308&edit=1