Re: XSL phpweb builds going live!

If I correctly remember, we weren't using XSL because a few years ago there wasn't any free tool good enough to handle the big php manual (it was much slower than dsssl and often segfaulted). Nowadays this isn't the case, so we can use both technologies. (anyway I only know dsssl and not xsl, so you are nominated the official maintainer of such things :P) Ah, we still don't have PDFs because there isn't still a program to convert fo->pdf nicelly. Apache's FOP is simply too slow and needs huge amounts of RAM. Nuno ----- Original Message -----

Hi Derick & all I've been looking into phpweb_xsl build the last few days and honestly have _no_ idea why it isn't used. I dug through the archives searching for a reason - not found anything yet. It looks like it simply got dropped since "livedocs is around the corner". Anyway! I made tiny adjustments to the xsl build yesterday and it should be pretty much the same as the dssssl builds - except from only taking little under 90minutes (per translation) rather then 24hours and readable markup and easier and... The only way to know for sure is trying it out, live! Featuring new functable (Sean), image output examples and almost-completed-"new"-docstyle (Mehdi) to boot, I hereby ask you to rebuild all translations, starting with en, using phpweb_xsl \o/ -Hannes