Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/reference/datetime/functions strtotime.xml

Hannes Magnusson wrote:

On 4/9/07, Maciek Sokolewicz <tularis@php.net> wrote:

tularis         Mon Apr  9 13:24:35 2007 UTC

Modified files:

    /phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions     strtotime.xml

Log: fix typo in section about 2-digit interpretation (usernote) http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml?r1=1.21&r2=1.22&diff_format=u Index: phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml diff -u phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml:1.21 phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml:1.22 --- phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml:1.21 Thu Feb 15 08:12:19 2007

+++ phpdoc/en/reference/datetime/functions/strtotime.xml        Mon Apr  9 13:24:35 2007

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> -<!-- $Revision: 1.21 $ --> +<!-- $Revision: 1.22 $ --> <!-- splitted from ./en/functions/datetime.xml, last change in rev 1.8 --> <refentry id="function.strtotime"> <refnamediv> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ <note>

    <para>
     If the number of the year is specified in a two digit format, the values
-    between 0-69 are mapped to 2000-2069 and 70-100 to 1970-2000.
+    between 0-69 are mapped to 2000-2069 and 70-99 to 1970-2000.

This doesn't make sense either. Shouldn't it be 1970-1999 then? -Hannes

    </para>

</note> </refsect1>

Good point, can't believe I missed that! :) - maciek