Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/internals/pdo building.xml error-handling.xml implementing.xml index.xml intro.xml pdo-dbh-t.xml pdo-stmt-t.xml preparation.xml
prerequisites.xml
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:22:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: cvs: phpdoc /en/internals/pdo building.xml error-handling.xml implementing.xml index.xml intro.xml pdo-dbh-t.xml pdo-stmt-t.xml preparation.xml prerequisites.xml |
||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969376573@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
It's easy to say "credit everyone" but implementing this in a fair, manageable, and positive way is nearly impossible. But on my official new editors todo list is to discuss and propose good ideas because our current situation is indeed problematic. We do discuss it from time to time but it's a tough and large topic that won't be solved overnight. But that's not being discussed in this thread so let's move on.
The removed text in those PDO docs did not follow the guidelines so it was a bug. Nowhere else does text exist like this so what makes the PDO HOWTO so special? If a person and/or company absolutely insists on inserting copyright/author information into a file then they need not commit it to the phpdoc CVS module because nobody deserves special treatment or owns certain text in the manual. The original commit for this did not include author or copyright specific XML markup but that was incorrectly added later. Bill and Rick have now appropriately been added to the contributors list, a list that Wez is already on. The original commented copyright information remains in the source and will stay there but in the future such copyrighted information should not be added to the PHP manual. I hope this pleases all parties and hope the reasons are clear and understandable.
Regards,
Philip
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Wez Furlong wrote:
You already know my views on this ridiculous scheme (for the others listening in, search the archives for penis comparison). As for community needs, nobody in the community needs these authors names removed from the text, but on the other hand, the community does need documentation. There was nothing wrong with putting correct attribution in the text, so there is no reason to remove it now. In fact, it's a big f-you to those people. I strongly recommend that you put their names back. If you insist on removing good documentation over this retarded ideal, so be it, but don't expect me to contribute any further, nor to have me recommend anyone else waste their time either. --Wez. Philip Olson wrote:Hello Wez- The PHP manual does not insert author and company names like this and I encouraged Gwynne to remove these attributions. We're researching a method for crediting "sponsored" documentation but they should not be treated in a special manner... all contributors and contributions should be treated the same. In fact, the entire credits system (a topic that is just about impossible to maintain) is being reevaluated at this time. The text did say we can "edit, combine, transform, rewrite, etc. as suits the needs of the community" and the community does not write credits like that nor does a commit imply that credits will be added outside the CVS changelog. I am not prepared to discuss the credit system as a whole but in time it will happen. If you/they require that information to remain as is then I'd rather remove the docs and move on but I doubt it will come to that. The work is appreciated but we must remain fair and consistent and encourage everyone to feel free to edit any and all documentation in the manual and never worry about when or when not to add a persons name. Regards, Philip On Jun 6, 2007, at 6:13 AM, Wez Furlong wrote:Please put the attribution back, as a matter of courtesy to those authors efforts as they kindly donated those docs and don't otherwise have any way of being credited for their work. --Wez. PS: As a general rule of thumb, never remove any attribution, license or copyright information from a file unless you are 100% certain that it no longer applies. Buesching, Logan J wrote:I thought all the docs we have and create were under an open license? ________________________________ From: Nuno Lopes [mailto:nlopess@php.net] Sent: Wed 6/6/2007 8:32 AM To: Gwynne Amaya Raskind Cc: PHPdoc; wez@php.net Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] cvs: phpdoc /en/internals/pdo building.xml error-handling.xml implementing.xml index.xml intro.xml pdo-dbh-t.xml pdo-stmt-t.xml preparation.xml prerequisites.xmlgwynne Wed Jun 6 05:20:48 2007 UTC Modified files: /phpdoc/en/internals/pdo building.xml error-handling.xmlI don't know if that is legal. You need to check out what was the agreement with IBM for distribution of those docs. Maybe Wez can help on this subject? Nunoimplementing.xml index.xml intro.xml pdo-dbh-t.xml pdo-stmt-t.xml preparation.xml prerequisites.xmlLog: - Fixed several spelling and grammatical errors in the PDO documentation. - Removed displayed author information from the PDO documentation front page.