Summary: Let's do it. However, I prefer doc-cvs@ and doc-bugs@ but
keep phpdoc@ for historical reasons even though it would be nice to
change it to doc@ including the cvs module name. Still thinking about
that one... what does everyone else think?
I don't think renaming phpdoc@ to doc@ is such a good idea since the
modules are called phpdoc[-*] and physically renaming them on the cvs
server is just wrong (and will break aaaaaloooot of scripts and
checkouts and other stuff out there).
doc-cvs@ and doc-bugs@ however is fine with me.
The idea of renaming phpdoc to doc stems from being tired of the PHPDoc versus phpdoc confusion so I couldn't help but mention it. But it appears we may have decided on the following structure:
doc-bugs@ -- All bug activity (new)
doc-chm@ -- For the CHM versions of the manual
doc-cvs@ -- CVS commits (new)
doc-license@ -- Our license
doc-web@ --
http://doc.php.net/
php-notes@ -- All user notes go here
phpdoc@ -- Communication
So, we'd have seven mailing lists (two new) and one for each translation. So unless people object or come up with something better, let's set this into motion a week from now on September 4, 2007.
Regards,
Philip