Re: new-reference-structure builds on docs.php.net

Hi Olivier In theory it would be better to merge all changes from HEAD to REF_STRUCT_DEV, but due to the amount of changes in HEAD lately that is alot of work so when we merge from the branch later we just have to be careful to not rollback the changes. -Hannes On Nov 28, 2007 3:01 AM, Olivier Hill <ohill@php.net> wrote: > Hello, > > If I have added a new function in the manual last week (new XML file), > should I MFH it to that branch and/or other branches? Or should I just > let it alone not to clash with anyone else's work? > > Olivier > > > On Nov 27, 2007 7:36 PM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 26, 2007, at 4:09 PM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > Just a heads up, http://docs.php.net is now building > > > from the > > > REF_STRUCT_DEV branch and will continue doing so until the rest of the > > > 150 extensions have been upgraded and we can ditch the branch. > > > > > > It would be great if people could pitch in, upgrading couple of > > > reference pages to the new-ref-struct - or upgrading some functions to > > > the new-doc-style (which is ~4years old..) :) > > > > > > The following wiki entry details how to help with the new-ref-struct > > update: > > > > http://doc.php.net/wiki/skeletons/convert > > > > I'll finish the new-doc-style update these coming days. > > > > Regards, > > Philip > > >