Re: Revision tracking in phpdoc and peardoc
| From: | Richard Quadling | Date: | Wed, 12 Nov 2008 11:01:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Revision tracking in phpdoc and peardoc | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969379675@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
2008/11/12 Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 03:09, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 10 Nov 2008, at 12:32, Hannes Magnusson wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 00:05, Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So what do people think now, one year after the last discussion?
>>>
>>> I still think manual bumping is the way-to-go, but I can live with
>>> automaticbumping if someone writes such a svn hook.
>>
>> If the committer does nothing with a revision tag, then it should be assumed
>> that the commit is translation worthy. However, if the committer feels it
>> should not be translated (like simply typo, WS, ...), then said committer
>> should be able to easily say so thus not outdate any translations with the
>> commit. In other words, I prefer we lean towards the side of caution here by
>> not requiring a manual bump.
>
> I guess.
> "Tagging" commit messages with "[NOBUMP]" (i.e. "[NOBUMP] Fixed typo,
> no need to translate") when the revision shouldn't increased..
> The problem there is however people will actually have to remember to
> use that "tag"..
>
>
>> How? I'm not sure. But once we all agree on a general route then I'm
>> guessing we could figure out how to implement. Also, I'm guessing the move
>> to SVN will open up a few more options here too.
>
> But we have to be ready before the SVN move as the move will destroy
> our current revision checks. It cannot work and will get fucked right
> after the first commit to SVN unless we have the hooks ready.
>
> -Hannes
>
Is there a way to create a template for commits?
[ ] Typo/WS
[ ] Minor change
[ ] Major change/rewrite
[ ] Example added
Bug #
Comments::
I use Windows's TortoiseCVS and TortoiseSVN. When I commit using these
tools I get the option of previous comments. So I can at least edit a
previous one, though the possibility of an error here does exist.
When I used Cygwin's CVS to commit changes, the editor runs with a
template with comments telling me what to do.
So, maybe there is a way to create a template for the phpdoc project
which must/should be adhered to.
Richard.
--
-----
Richard Quadling
Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731
"Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"