Re: Categorizing SPL

Hello, On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all > > What do you all think about categorizing SPL? > > Browsing ~50 classes and exceptions and 7 interfaces is a lot.. > > I'd like to move Iterators into its own <part>, Exceptions (when they > get committed) into one, and datastructures into one. > That leaves SplFileInfo and ArrayObject (maybe others) free standing, > plus another "container" for functions. > > That change will probably kill of translations that have translated > datastructures.xml (as that file will become a container (<part>) for > the datastructure classes)... +1 The datastructure doc was already an attempt at having those separated, so I wouldn't be happier if spl would be entirely categorized. Regards > > -Hannes > > -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction. -- Pascal