Re: Function Index

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 17:56, Richard Quadling <rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/3/25 Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>: >> >>> I've just got to the chicken/egg situation. >>> >>> Currently, I'm testing my version of funcindex.xml (unserialized refs, >>> sorted, output as new funcindex.xml, configure, build)... >>> >>> If that works, then I'll commit the new funcindex.xml and the code I >>> used to build it. >> >> Personally I do not feel these generated and monolithic files should be in >> CVS and awhile back wrote a bug report about the situation. Please evaluate >> it. >> >>  http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=47651 >> >> Regards, >> Philip >> >> > > Ok. My initial approach of using the serialized file is a chicken/egg issue. > > I'm not a DocBook expert, but is it possible to have an empty <index> > tag with a role of something like "dynamic_functionIndex" which PhD > can pick up on? Sure... we could also use the version.xml files? They should, in theory at least, contain every single method and function.. -Hannes