Re: docs to svn business
| From: | Eddie Drapkin | Date: | Thu, 09 Jul 2009 18:02:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: docs to svn business | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969380598@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Niel<spam-free@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi
>
>> When a translator updates a translation (a file), they write which CVS
>> Revision in EN it's synced to. So, later when the EN version is
>> updated we then know that the translated is outdated. And all of our
>> translation tools rely on the incremental nature of CVS revision
>> numbers.
Why is this a problem? SVN revision numbers are incremental as well.
I don't see the difference between tying a translation to CVS-123456
and SVN-123456?