Re: Intro and quick patches
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:23:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Intro and quick patches | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969380630@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Niel Archer wrote:
This diff brings up a good point for us to discuss. What is the preferred method to check something out from SVN? Most anything we do requires at least two SVN checkouts. A classic example for English: - cd /where/doc/stuff/is/stored - svn co http://svn.php.net/repository/phpdoc/en/trunk phpdoc/en - svn co http://svn.php.net/repository/phpdoc/doc-base/trunk phpdoc/doc-base Leaving us with en and doc-base directories. And then for phpdoc-all it gets trickier, well, a lot longer. The choices seem to be either: - use svn:externals - create and promote scripts for this - change our structure/layout - ... ? I don't understand the pros and cons of using svn:externals but the topic seems to have a holy war type feel to it. Is this true and/or avoidable? What are the pros and cons? If a script is used, I imagine it'd be stored in doc-base then used to checkout languages. I also imagine other places at php.net would use it (or svn:externals). Regards, PhilipDiffs attached.Should I resend them converted?Yeah, also note a couple typos in there that turned 'phpdoc' checkouts into 'phd'.