Re: Intro and quick patches

From: Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:23:00 +0000
Subject: Re: Intro and quick patches
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969380630@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Jul 14, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Niel Archer wrote:
Should I resend them converted?
Yeah, also note a couple typos in there that turned 'phpdoc' checkouts into 'phd'.
Diffs attached.
This diff brings up a good point for us to discuss. What is the preferred method to check something out from SVN? Most anything we do requires at least two SVN checkouts. A classic example for English: - cd /where/doc/stuff/is/stored - svn co http://svn.php.net/repository/phpdoc/en/trunk phpdoc/en - svn co http://svn.php.net/repository/phpdoc/doc-base/trunk phpdoc/doc-base Leaving us with en and doc-base directories. And then for phpdoc-all it gets trickier, well, a lot longer. The choices seem to be either: - use svn:externals - create and promote scripts for this - change our structure/layout - ... ? I don't understand the pros and cons of using svn:externals but the topic seems to have a holy war type feel to it. Is this true and/or avoidable? What are the pros and cons? If a script is used, I imagine it'd be stored in doc-base then used to checkout languages. I also imagine other places at php.net would use it (or svn:externals). Regards, Philip

« previous php.doc (#969380630) next »