Re: SPL Autoload Register Patch

2009/7/28 Brandon Savage <brandon@brandonsavage.net>: > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:30, Brandon Savage<brandon@brandonsavage.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> I spent a bit going over the wording with someone else before I submitted >>> it. According to what I understand, it creates a stack, but doesn't >>> behave >>> in the way a stack does (last in first out). Effectively it's a queue but >>> I >>> believe it places the functions on the stack, so I'm not really sure. I >>> do >>> know it goes through then in a first-in, first-out sort of fashion. >>> >>> I don't see the WS you're referring to. >> >> >> Me neither. >> I can see a single space between <function> and spl_autoload_register on line 10 of the latest patch in this thread (dated 27 July 2009 12:48 for me), it is that to which I was referring. Like you, I've no idea if whitespace within tags like <function> is significant or not. >> Are you planning on contributing more docs, or do you want someone to >> commit this for you? >> >> I was told on IRC that my replies looked "brutal", which was totally >> not the intention. >> I thought you were posting so small patch just to get hang of these >> things and looking for all possible feedback to "get it right" before >> looking at bigger tasks.. >> >> I could easily have adjusted your initial patch myself and committed >> it right away if you had no interest in contributing more and didn't >> want to learn how to do it better. >> >> -Hannes > > I've been on the list a while, but I was asked to modify the docs in this > case. It's fairly straight forward so I will probably edit them as an > ongoing process, and learning how it's done. >