Re: Re: svn: /phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/datetime/datetime/ add.xml modify.xml setdate.xml setisodate.xml settime.xml settimestamp.xml settimezone.xml
sub.xml

From: Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 19:20:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: svn: /phpdoc/en/trunk/reference/datetime/datetime/ add.xml modify.xml setdate.xml setisodate.xml settime.xml settimestamp.xml settimezone.xml
sub.xml
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6  Groups: php.doc 
Request: Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969381808@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi Folks: On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 10:31:15AM +0200, Hannes Magnusson wrote: > > None of our docs mention this (see intl and mysqli for example). > > It is clearly expected behavior and is documented in the oo chapters. Just because a function takes an object as a parameter does not mean the function has to modify that object. The DateTime functions return a DateTime object. In the following example: $date = date_create(); $result = date_date_set($date, 2001, 2, 3); An unsuspecting user could think only $result contains the new date and go about needlessly writing in new variables rather than just using $date. And eventually some such user will add a user comment telling people that $date gets modified. It seems to me the documentation should be explicit as to how things work. The current parameter text says: Procedural style only: A DateTime object returned by date_create() I suggest it say something like: Procedural style only: A DateTime object returned by date_create(). The function modifies this object. What do people think? Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409

« previous php.doc (#969381808) next »