Re: PhD TypeMaps.

On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:32, Richard Quadling <rquadling@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi. > > In the Package_Generic_XHTML::$myelementmap, when a tag has multiple > mappings, what is the relationship between the element and the > multiple mappings. > > Is it a direct parent/child relationship or is it ancestor. Its a parent/child relationship. I have never seen an example where you need to check the grandfather without caring for the parent. > I'm having an issue with generating the correct output for ... > > <methodsynopsis> >  <void /> >  <methodname>__destruct</methodname> >  <void /> > </methodsynopsis> > > According to http://www.docbook.org/xml/5.0/dtd/docbook.dtd / , > this > is valid markup (and passes validation) ... I saw the thread on docbook@, interesting question. I do agree with Stefan, but for consistency with the rest of the docs I do think we should always mention the arguments. Regarding the returnvalue using <void /> rather then <type>void</type>.. I've never considered this, and we use <type>void</type> a lot of the docs, and link it - where as we do not link <void />. I have no idea why we use <type>void</type> here rather then <void />.. > > > Ideally I'd like a way to tell PhD to differentiate between <void /> > following and not following <methodname>. > You should be able to check what the previous sibling element is in the format_() functions. I don't have a PhD checkout here, but I think its something like $props["PREVIOUS_SIBLING"]. -Hannes