Re: Re: PhpStorm open source license for PHP Documentation team
| From: | Jesus M. Castagnetto | Date: | Thu, 07 Jul 2011 22:16:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PhpStorm open source license for PHP Documentation team | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.doc |
| Request: | Send a blank email to phpdoc+get-969382904@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
OK, domo arigato for the info.
Just saw that they have a demo. Will try that and if it works well I will
check for a classroom license so my GUI-biased students might be happier :-)
Philip: emacs? you kids these days :-)
This concludes me hijacking the thread, so we can go to the regularly
scheduled one.
/me with flu at home and bothering the phpdoc list
--
Jesus M. Castagnetto <jesus@castagnetto.com>
Web: http://www.castagnetto.com/
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 16:50, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:
>
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 1:58 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Jesus M. Castagnetto
> > <jesus@castagnetto.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry to hijack a bit the thread. Being an old-fart Unix-head, I had not
> >> used much GUI IDEs for PHP coding, but some of my students are always
> asking
> >> for those. Only one I've played with is the Eclipse-PDT.
> >> Is PHPStorm better or similar to that one?
> >>
> >
> > similar, both eclipse and phpstorm is written in java, so they are
> > both available on linux also.
> > my personal experience is that phpstorm is better and less resource
> hungry.
> > people at jetbrains really know how to make a good IDE.
>
> I think it's important to note that the PHP documentation team, as an
> entity, does not prefer or promote specific editors. It's nice that PhpStorm
> offered members a license, but that's the extent of it. Not saying anyone
> here is saying that but we, as a group, accept and love all editors
> equally... even Emacs. :)
>
> Regards,
> Philip
>
>