Re: Re: svn: /phpdoc/ doc-base/trunk/entities/global.ent doc-base/trunk/manual.xml.in en/trunk/reference/suhosin/book.xml
en/trunk/reference/suhosin/configure.xml en/trunk/reference/suhosin/constants.xml en/trunk/reference/suhosin

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:19, Jakub Vrana <vrana@php.net> wrote: >> There are already another extensions not available via php.net documented in >> the PHP Manual (sqlsrv and pdo_sqlsrv). So I didn't know that it is a >> requirement. I'm sorry for the guerilla approach but I really didn't suppose >> that it will be a problem. > > Both of them have pecl packages and available via php.net. > > >> Suhosin is still very relevant today because it is a part of PHP package in >> some Linux distributions. And people are asking questions like: > > I do somewhat agree with you, but if the author doesn't want to be > involved with php.net then there is very little we can (nor should) do > about it. > If the distros are messing with PHP then they (following our license) > cannot call it PHP anymore, and should warn people about that fact and > ensure their users understand the consciences. > imo almost every distro has some patches (apart from suhosin), isn't that the same violation? it would seem weird if we start a witch-hunt for suhosin only. -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu